| |||||||
  | |||||||
 | |||||||
| 1 | SENATE RESOLUTION
 | ||||||
| 2 |  WHEREAS, On September 17, 2008, the Electronic Products  | ||||||
| 3 | Recycling
and Reuse Act, Public Act 95-0959, was enacted,  | ||||||
| 4 | setting forth
procedures for the recycling and reuse of covered  | ||||||
| 5 | electronic devices
in Illinois; and
 | ||||||
| 6 |  WHEREAS, The Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act  | ||||||
| 7 | banned
the disposal of covered electronic devices in landfills  | ||||||
| 8 | and
incinerators beginning January 1, 2012; and
 | ||||||
| 9 |  WHEREAS, To provide adequate collection of discarded  | ||||||
| 10 | electronic
devices and comply with the disposal ban, more than  | ||||||
| 11 | 500 collection
sites statewide are currently registered with  | ||||||
| 12 | the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to accept  | ||||||
| 13 | electronic wastes; and
 | ||||||
| 14 |  WHEREAS, Local governments statewide have contracted with
 | ||||||
| 15 | electronic waste processors and recyclers for collection,  | ||||||
| 16 | reuse, and
recycling of discarded electronics, providing a  | ||||||
| 17 | vital service to their
residents; and
 | ||||||
| 18 |  WHEREAS, A significant component of the discarded  | ||||||
| 19 | electronic
waste stream collected to date has been, and  | ||||||
| 20 | continues to be, cathode
ray tube (CRT) devices, including  | ||||||
| 21 | televisions and computer monitors; and
 | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  WHEREAS, CRT glass contains lead at a sufficiently high
 | ||||||
| 2 | concentration to meet the definition of hazardous waste,  | ||||||
| 3 | necessitating
handling the glass in a manner that protects  | ||||||
| 4 | human health and the
environment; and
 | ||||||
| 5 |  WHEREAS, The principal recycling market for CRT glass was
 | ||||||
| 6 | historically the production of new CRTs; and
 | ||||||
| 7 |  WHEREAS, Demand for new CRTs historically provided an  | ||||||
| 8 | economic
incentive to recycle CRT glass for use in the  | ||||||
| 9 | manufacturing of new
CRTs, and recyclers received revenue for  | ||||||
| 10 | the CRT glass provided to CRT
manufacturers; and
 | ||||||
| 11 |  WHEREAS, New CRTs have essentially ceased to be purchased  | ||||||
| 12 | in the
United States, and there are no CRT manufacturing  | ||||||
| 13 | facilities located
in the United States; and
 | ||||||
| 14 |  WHEREAS, All CRT glass used in the manufacturing of new  | ||||||
| 15 | CRTs is
now exported to India to the single remaining CRT  | ||||||
| 16 | manufacturing
facility in the world; and
 | ||||||
| 17 |  WHEREAS, There exist limited additional available outlets  | ||||||
| 18 | for the
legitimate recycling of CRT glass in the United States;  | ||||||
| 19 | and
 | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  WHEREAS, The quantity of CRT glass collected far exceeds  | ||||||
| 2 | current
demand and available markets for the glass; and
 | ||||||
| 3 |  WHEREAS, CRT glass processing and recycling now carries a
 | ||||||
| 4 | substantial cost, a significant change since the Electronic  | ||||||
| 5 | Products
Recycling and Reuse Act was enacted in 2008; and
 | ||||||
| 6 |  WHEREAS, The increased cost to process CRT glass has caused  | ||||||
| 7 | a
number of electronic waste collection programs operated by  | ||||||
| 8 | local
governments in Illinois to bear the cost increases or to  | ||||||
| 9 | be
discontinued to avoid accumulation of CRTs; and
 | ||||||
| 10 |  WHEREAS, Stockpiles of abandoned CRT glass have been  | ||||||
| 11 | discovered
at several former electronic waste processing  | ||||||
| 12 | facilities across the
United States, due to the lack of markets  | ||||||
| 13 | for CRT glass and the high
cost associated with existing  | ||||||
| 14 | markets; and
 | ||||||
| 15 |  WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Recycling and Peoria Disposal Company  | ||||||
| 16 | (PDC),
both Illinois-based businesses, developed and permitted  | ||||||
| 17 | a CRT glass
solution, the KleanKover Recycling Solution,  | ||||||
| 18 | whereby CRT glass is
treated to reduce the leachable lead  | ||||||
| 19 | levels in the glass (the
principal environmental concern  | ||||||
| 20 | associated with CRTs) below stringent
federal thresholds and  | ||||||
| 21 | placed as Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) in a
permitted  | ||||||
| 22 | landfill; and
 | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC have successfully  | ||||||
| 2 | operated
the KleanKover Recycling Solution since November of  | ||||||
| 3 | 2013; and
 | ||||||
| 4 |  WHEREAS, Given the lack of viable recycling markets, the  | ||||||
| 5 | IEPA has
determined that treated CRT glass used as ADC can be  | ||||||
| 6 | counted towards
manufacturer recycling goals under the  | ||||||
| 7 | Electronic Products Recycling
and Reuse Act, as documented in  | ||||||
| 8 | IEPA correspondence to Kuusakoski
Recycling on November 26,  | ||||||
| 9 | 2013; and
 | ||||||
| 10 |  WHEREAS, Sustainable Electronics Recycling International  | ||||||
| 11 | (SERI),
administrators of the R2 Standard (a voluntary  | ||||||
| 12 | certification standard
for electronic waste recyclers) has  | ||||||
| 13 | prohibited its certified recyclers
from using the KleanKover  | ||||||
| 14 | Recycling Solution or any other use of CRT
glass as ADC; and
 | ||||||
| 15 |  WHEREAS, At least 11 government jurisdictions in Illinois,
 | ||||||
| 16 | representing over 4.3 million people and with some of the most
 | ||||||
| 17 | effective e-waste recycling programs in the U.S., have  | ||||||
| 18 | petitioned SERI
to reconsider its position on CRT glass  | ||||||
| 19 | management, citing the need
for additional CRT glass management  | ||||||
| 20 | options in the U.S.; and
 | ||||||
| 21 |  WHEREAS, Basel Action Network (BAN), administrators of the  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | eStewards
Standard (a separate voluntary certification  | ||||||
| 2 | standard for
electronic waste recyclers) has defined any use of  | ||||||
| 3 | treated CRT glass
within a disposal facility, including use as  | ||||||
| 4 | ADC, as a "last resort"
option, effectively prohibiting use of  | ||||||
| 5 | the KleanKover Recycling
Solution; and
 | ||||||
| 6 |  WHEREAS, BAN has expressed interest in considering  | ||||||
| 7 | retrievable
storage of CRT glass in permitted, monitored, and  | ||||||
| 8 | contained designated
disposal sites as a preferred CRT glass  | ||||||
| 9 | management method; and
 | ||||||
| 10 |  WHEREAS, In response to BAN's interest, PDC has proposed to
 | ||||||
| 11 | develop a designated storage cell at its Indian Creek Landfill  | ||||||
| 12 | to
provide storage and future retrieval of CRT glass, should  | ||||||
| 13 | markets
develop to utilize the leaded glass; and
 | ||||||
| 14 |  WHEREAS, The Indian Creek Landfill is fully permitted to  | ||||||
| 15 | develop
the retrievable storage cell and accept treated CRT  | ||||||
| 16 | glass for
placement in the cell, as confirmed by IEPA in a  | ||||||
| 17 | letter to PDC dated
January 26, 2015; and
 | ||||||
| 18 |  WHEREAS, PDC has established a perpetual care fund for the  | ||||||
| 19 | Indian
Creek Landfill, consisting of a trust fund held by a  | ||||||
| 20 | third-party and
available to Tazewell County (the host  | ||||||
| 21 | jurisdiction for the landfill),
which provides funding to  | ||||||
| 22 | monitor and maintain the landfill into
perpetuity, an even  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | greater level of financial and environmental
protection than is  | ||||||
| 2 | required under state and federal regulations; and
 | ||||||
| 3 |  WHEREAS, PDC hosted a tour at the Indian Creek Landfill on
 | ||||||
| 4 | October 23, 2014 for approximately 35 attendees of the annual
 | ||||||
| 5 | conference of the Illinois Counties Solid Waste Management  | ||||||
| 6 | Association
(ILCSWMA) to show attendees how CRT glass is  | ||||||
| 7 | currently managed,
present the plan for retrievable storage,  | ||||||
| 8 | and answer questions; and
 | ||||||
| 9 |  WHEREAS, ILCSWMA conference attendees were subsequently  | ||||||
| 10 | polled to
determine their support for allowing treated CRT  | ||||||
| 11 | glass to be placed in
a landfill regardless of whether it is  | ||||||
| 12 | used as ADC or placed in a
dedicated cell for retrievable  | ||||||
| 13 | storage, and attendees voiced nearly
unanimous support of this  | ||||||
| 14 | option with only 2 of the approximately 60
participants  | ||||||
| 15 | dissenting; and
 | ||||||
| 16 |  WHEREAS, Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC formally petitioned  | ||||||
| 17 | BAN on
November 18, 2014 to modify its standard and allow, as  | ||||||
| 18 | an additional
preferred CRT glass management option, the  | ||||||
| 19 | placement of treated CRT
glass in a retrievable storage cell  | ||||||
| 20 | within a permitted disposal site
which has a perpetual care  | ||||||
| 21 | fund established; and
 | ||||||
| 22 |  WHEREAS, At least 10 government jurisdictions in Illinois
 | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | representing nearly 4 million people have sent letters to BAN  | ||||||
| 2 | in
support of Kuusakoski Recycling and PDC's petition and  | ||||||
| 3 | urging BAN'S
approval in order to maintain their vital  | ||||||
| 4 | electronic waste collection
and recycling programs for their  | ||||||
| 5 | residents; and
 | ||||||
| 6 |  WHEREAS, The option of retrievable storage of treated CRT  | ||||||
| 7 | glass
in a dedicated cell at a permitted disposal site will  | ||||||
| 8 | provide needed
environmentally protective, cost effective, and  | ||||||
| 9 | immediately available
capacity for CRT glass, resulting in  | ||||||
| 10 | relief for residents, local
governments, and recyclers across  | ||||||
| 11 | Illinois and the United States to manage this problematic  | ||||||
| 12 | material and reduce the potential for future
discoveries of  | ||||||
| 13 | stockpiled material that would pose a significant
 | ||||||
| 14 | environmental threat; therefore, be it
 | ||||||
| 15 |  RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-NINTH GENERAL  | ||||||
| 16 | ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we urge the Basel  | ||||||
| 17 | Action Network and the
e-Stewards Leadership Council to approve  | ||||||
| 18 | the pending petition
submitted by Kuusakoski Recycling and  | ||||||
| 19 | Peoria Disposal Company to allow
the placement of treated CRT  | ||||||
| 20 | glass into a dedicated retrievable
storage cell in a permitted  | ||||||
| 21 | disposal facility; and be it further
 | ||||||
| 22 |  RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be  | ||||||
| 23 | delivered to
the Executive Director of the Basel Action Network  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | and the policy
director of the Basel Action Network.
 | ||||||