| |||||||
  | |||||||
 | |||||||
| 1 | HOUSE RESOLUTION
 | ||||||
| 2 |  WHEREAS, A proposed educational pension cost shift, which  | ||||||
| 3 | would shift the cost burden from the State of Illinois to local  | ||||||
| 4 | school districts, community colleges, and institutions of  | ||||||
| 5 | higher education, is under discussion; this proposal would  | ||||||
| 6 | require all employers of members in the Teachers' Retirement  | ||||||
| 7 | System and the State Universities Retirement System to pay the  | ||||||
| 8 | normal cost of pension benefits earned; and
 | ||||||
| 9 |  WHEREAS, If this proposal were to become policy, for the  | ||||||
| 10 | Teachers' Retirement System and the State Universities  | ||||||
| 11 | Retirement System, it would potentially move $10.187 billion in  | ||||||
| 12 | estimated normal costs of pension benefits earned from the  | ||||||
| 13 | State to local school districts, community colleges, and  | ||||||
| 14 | institutions of higher learning over a 10-year period;  | ||||||
| 15 | actuarial changes recently made by these 2 systems will further  | ||||||
| 16 | increase these numbers; and
 | ||||||
| 17 |  WHEREAS, This plan would move these spending commitments  | ||||||
| 18 | from one taxing body, the State, to a group of taxing bodies,  | ||||||
| 19 | the school districts and community colleges, while additional  | ||||||
| 20 | pension costs would be shifted to State universities; and
 | ||||||
| 21 |  WHEREAS, A pension cost shift would lead to a massive  | ||||||
| 22 | increase in local funding requirements on school districts; the  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | cost shift would exacerbate the problem of adequately funding  | ||||||
| 2 | our local schools by taking even more when districts, teachers,  | ||||||
| 3 | and local voters are fighting to simply keep educational  | ||||||
| 4 | opportunities open to our students; in addition, a pension cost  | ||||||
| 5 | shift would likely lead to massive property tax hikes or to  | ||||||
| 6 | classroom cuts that will harm our students; and
 | ||||||
| 7 |  WHEREAS, According to the Illinois State Board of  | ||||||
| 8 | Education, 67% of school districts in the State are operating  | ||||||
| 9 | in the red; and
 | ||||||
| 10 |  WHEREAS, School districts already bear a large share of the  | ||||||
| 11 | Teachers' Retirement System pension burden by paying a  | ||||||
| 12 | statutory share of the System's total contribution costs,  | ||||||
| 13 | constituting 0.58% of pensionable teacher payroll; districts  | ||||||
| 14 | also contribute towards any locally-negotiated early  | ||||||
| 15 | retirement options and for the pension costs of certain  | ||||||
| 16 | increases in compensation, totaling $92.5 million in Fiscal  | ||||||
| 17 | Year 2012; and
 | ||||||
| 18 |  WHEREAS, Representatives from Northern Illinois University  | ||||||
| 19 | publicly stated that if the cost shift were to be covered by  | ||||||
| 20 | increasing tuition on parents and students, each percentage of  | ||||||
| 21 | payroll cost shifted to the university would translate into a  | ||||||
| 22 | 2% tuition increase; this proposed cost shift would also  | ||||||
| 23 | increase the liability of State-funded universities and all  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | community colleges, thus making higher education even more  | ||||||
| 2 | unaffordable for students and their parents; and
 | ||||||
| 3 |  WHEREAS, This plan would harm the interests of all  | ||||||
| 4 | taxpayers, especially in downstate and suburban areas and would  | ||||||
| 5 | sharply increase inequities created by the current school aid  | ||||||
| 6 | formula between Chicago and the rest of the State; because of  | ||||||
| 7 | the impact on institutions of higher education, Chicago  | ||||||
| 8 | taxpayers, parents, and students would also be affected;  | ||||||
| 9 | therefore, be it
 | ||||||
| 10 |  RESOLVED, BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE  | ||||||
| 11 | NINETY-NINTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that we  | ||||||
| 12 | state our belief that an educational pension cost shift is  | ||||||
| 13 | financially wrong and would only serve to shift pension burdens  | ||||||
| 14 | from the State to the status of an unfunded mandate.
 | ||||||