HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
H.B. NO. |
1967 |
THIRTIETH LEGISLATURE, 2020 |
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to self-DEFENSE
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
SECTION
1. The legislature finds that the people
of Hawaii are fearful for their safety due to the increase in violent crime
across the state. The recent surge of armed robberies, violent attacks,
shootings, and murder in the state compels people to consider ways to protect
themselves, others, and their property from those who seek to commit unlawful
acts. Current law does not provide a full-range of protection to law-abiding
citizens in situations where real harm can occur.
The legislature also finds twenty-seven states have implemented robust self-protection legislation, often described as "Stand Your Ground" laws, to ensure law-abiding citizens are able to execute their right to protect themselves, others, and their property without fear of prosecution. The goal of any law should be to empower law-abiding citizens, not the perpetrators. The purpose of this Act is to expand law-abiding citizens' right of self-protection.
SECTION 2. Section 703-304, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
"§703-304 Use of force in self-protection (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself, his property, or a third person against the use of unlawful force by the other person on the present occasion.
(2) The use of deadly force is justifiable under
this section if the actor believes that deadly force is necessary to defend
oneself, another person, or in defense of a legally occupied habitation or motor
vehicle against one who intends or endeavors to use unlawful force, or against one
who intends and endeavors to enter the legally occupied habitation or motor
vehicle of another for the purpose of assaulting or offering personal violence
to any person residing or being therein. There is no duty for the victim to retreat
under this section if:
(a)
The person is in a place where they have a right to be, including the person’s
place of business; and
(b) The person is not engaged in an unlawful activity.
[protect himself against death, serious bodily
injury, kidnapping, rape, or forcible sodomy.]
(3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection[s]
(4) [or (5)] of this section, a person employing protective force may estimate
the necessity thereof under the circumstances as he believes them to be when
the force is used without retreating, surrendering possession, doing any other
act which he has no legal duty to do, or abstaining from any lawful action.
(4) The use of force is not justifiable under
this section[:
(a) To resist an arrest which the actor knows is
being made by a law enforcement officer, although the arrest is unlawful;] To
resist a law enforcement officer or a private person assisting a law
enforcement officer acting in the performance of their official duties and they
identify themselves in accordance with applicable law or the person using force
knows or reasonably should have known the person is a law enforcement officer.
(b) To resist force used by the occupier or
possessor of property or by another person on his behalf, where the actor knows
that the person using the force is doing so under a claim of right to protect
the property, except that this limitation shall not apply if:
(i) The
actor is a public officer acting in the performance of his duties or a person
lawfully assisting him therein or a person making or assisting in a lawful
arrest.; or
(ii) The actor believes that such force is
necessary to protect himself against death or serious bodily injury.
"[(5) The use of deadly force is not justifiable
under this section if:
(a) The actor, with the intent of causing death or
serious bodily injury, provoked the use of force against himself in the same
encounter; or
(b) The actor knows that he can avoid the
necessity of using such force with complete safety by retreating or by
surrendering possession of a thing to a person asserting a claim of right
thereto or by complying with a demand that he abstain from any action which he
has no duty to take, except that:
(i) The actor is not obliged to retreat from his
dwelling or place of work, unless he was the initial aggressor or is assailed
in his place of work by another person whose place of work the actor knows it
to be; and
(ii) A public officer justified in using force in
the performance of his duties, or a person justified in using force in his
assistance or a person justified in using force in making an arrest or
preventing an escape, is not obliged to desist from efforts to perform his duty,
effect the arrest, or prevent the escape because of resistance or threatened
resistance by or on behalf of the person against whom the action is directed.]
[(6)]
(5) The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of
confinement as protective force only if the actor takes all reasonable measures
to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows that he safely can unless the
person confined has been arrested on a charge of crime.
(6) A person
who uses force, including deadly force, as justified and permitted under subsections
(1) and (2) is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of
such force, unless the force was determined to be unlawful."
SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
Report Title:
Self-protection, Public safety, Lethal force
Description:
Clarifies when force may be used to protect self, property, or a third person against unlawful force that could cause bodily harm.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent