BILL NUMBER: AB 1998 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 16, 2016
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 5, 2016
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Campos
( Coauthors: Assembly Members
Cristina Garcia and Gonzalez )
FEBRUARY 16, 2016
An act to amend Section 30061 of the Government Code,
to add Section 6033 to the Penal Code, and to amend
Sections 1961 and 1962 of the Welfare and Institutions Code,
relating to juveniles.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1998, as amended, Campos. Juveniles: data collection.
Existing law establishes in each county treasury a Supplemental
Law Enforcement Services Account (SLESA) to fund specified local
programs related to corrections. Existing law requires that 50% of
the moneys received into the county SLESA be allocated to implement a
comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plan developed by the
local juvenile justice coordinating council in each county or city
and county, and approved by the Board of State and Community
Corrections (Board). Existing law requires the juvenile justice plans
to include specified assessments of services and strategies to
assist at-risk juveniles.
This bill would recast those requirements to also include, among
other things, a description of the programs, strategies, and system
enhancements proposed to be funded by the county SLESA. The bill
would delete the requirement that the Board review the plan, and
would instead require annual review and updating of the plan by the
local juvenile justice coordinating council in a format specified by
the Board, and annual reports by the county or city and county to the
county board of supervisors and to the Board on the programs,
strategies, and system enhancements funded by the county SLESA and
expenditures for those purposes. The bill would require the Board to
compile those local reports summarizing the programs, strategies, and
system enhancements and related expenditures made by each county and
city and county and to report that data annually to the Governor and
the Legislature. The bill would require the Board to post on its
Internet Web site a description or summary of the programs,
strategies, or system enhancements from the local reports and to post
the annual report. The bill would authorize the local reports and
the annual report to be consolidated with certain reports pertaining
to the Youthful Offender Block Grant program. By imposing additional
duties on local entities, this bill would impose a state-mandated
local program.
Existing law establishes, within the Board of State and
Community Corrections, Board, the California
Juvenile Justice Data Working Group, as provided. Existing law
requires the working group to, among other things, analyze the
capacities and limitations of the data systems and networks used to
collect and report state and local juvenile caseload and outcome data
and prepare and submit a report to the Legislature, as specified.
This bill would require the Board of State and Community
Corrections to prepare guidelines Board, by January 1,
2018, to develop recommendations on best practices and
standardizations for counties on how to disaggregate juvenile
justice caseload and performance and outcome data by race and
ethnicity.
Existing law requires each county to prepare and submit a Juvenile
Justice Development Plan to the Corrections Standards Authority on
or before May 1 of each year for approval.
This bill would require the Juvenile Justice Development Plan to
be submitted to the Board instead of the Corrections Standards
Authority and would recast the report requirements to include
proposed programs, strategies, or system enhancements to be funded by
the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund. The bill would require the
Juvenile Justice Development Plan to be consolidated with the
comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans created by the local
councils for funding from county SLEAs, as described above. The bill
would require annual reports by counties regarding the use of the
block grant funds be submitted to the Board, instead of the
authority. The bill would require annual reports to the Governor and
the Legislature by the Board regarding the programs, strategies, and
system enhancements supported by the block grants, and posting of
those annual reports on the Board's Internet Web site. The bill would
make additional conforming changes. By imposing additional reporting
duties on local government entities, this bill would create a
state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these
statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no yes .
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 30061 of the
Government Code is amended to read:
30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account (SLESA), to receive all
amounts allocated to a county for purposes of implementing this
chapter.
(b) In any fiscal year for which a county receives moneys to be
expended for the implementation of this chapter, the county auditor
shall allocate the moneys in the county's SLESA within 30 days of the
deposit of those moneys into the fund. The moneys shall be allocated
as follows:
(1) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the county sheriff for
county jail construction and operation. In the case of Madera, Napa,
and Santa Clara Counties, this allocation shall be made to the county
director or chief of corrections.
(2) Five and fifteen-hundredths percent to the district attorney
for criminal prosecution.
(3) Thirty-nine and seven-tenths percent to the county and the
cities within the county, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern,
Siskiyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to the Broadmoor Police
Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the
Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina
Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and
Community Services District, in accordance with the relative
population of the cities within the county and the unincorporated
area of the county, and the Broadmoor Police Protection District in
the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District
and the Stallion Springs Community Services District in Kern County,
the Lake Shastina Community Services District in Siskiyou County, and
the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District in
Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate
by the population research unit of the Department of Finance, and as
adjusted to provide, except as provided in subdivision (i), a grant
of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law
enforcement jurisdiction. For a newly incorporated city whose
population estimate is not published by the Department of Finance,
but that was incorporated prior to July 1 of the fiscal year in which
an allocation from the SLESA is to be made, the city manager, or an
appointee of the legislative body, if a city manager is not
available, and the county administrative or executive officer shall
prepare a joint notification to the Department of Finance and the
county auditor with a population estimate reduction of the
unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of the
newly incorporated city by July 15, or within 15 days after the
Budget Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from
the SLESA is to be made. No person residing within the Broadmoor
Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services
District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake
Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police
Protection and Community Services District shall also be counted as
residing within the unincorporated area of the County of San Mateo,
Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or within any city located within
those counties. Except as provided in subdivision (i), the county
auditor shall allocate a grant of at least one hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisdiction. Moneys
allocated to the county pursuant to this subdivision shall be
retained in the county SLESA, and moneys allocated to a city pursuant
to this subdivision shall be deposited in an SLESA established in
the city treasury.
(4) Fifty percent to the county or city and county to implement a
comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plan as provided in this
paragraph. The juvenile justice plan shall be developed by the local
juvenile justice coordinating council in each county and city and
county with the membership described in Section 749.22 of the Welfare
and Institutions Code. If a plan has been previously
approved by the Corrections Standards Authority or, commencing July
1, 2012, by the Board of State and Community Corrections, the plan
shall be reviewed and modified annually by the council. The plan or
modified plan shall be approved by the county board of supervisors,
and in the case of a city and county, the plan shall also be approved
by the mayor. The plan shall be reviewed and updated
annually by the council. The plan or updated plan may, at the
discretion of the county or city and county, be approved by the
county board of supervisors. The plan or modified
updated plan shall be submitted to the Board of
State and Community Corrections by May 1 of each year.
year in a format specified by the board that
consolidates the form of submission of the annual comprehensive
juvenile justice multiagency plan to be developed under
this chapter with the form for submission of the annual Youthful
Offender Block Grant plan that is required to be developed and
submitted pursuant to Section 1961 of the Welfare and Institutions
Code.
(A) Juvenile justice plans The multiagency
juvenile justice plan shall include, but not be limited to,
all of the following components:
(i) An assessment of existing law enforcement, probation,
education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol,
and youth services resources that specifically target at-risk
juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families.
(ii) An identification and prioritization of the neighborhoods,
schools, and other areas in the community that face a significant
public safety risk from juvenile crime, such as gang activity,
daylight burglary, late-night robbery, vandalism, truancy, controlled
substances sales, firearm-related violence, and juvenile substance
abuse and alcohol use.
(iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides for a
continuum of responses to juvenile crime and delinquency and
demonstrates a collaborative and integrated approach for implementing
a system of swift, certain, and graduated responses for at-risk
youth and juvenile offenders.
(iv) Programs identified in clause (iii) A
description of the programs, strategies, or system
enhancements that are proposed to be funded pursuant to this
subparagraph, including the projected amount of funding for
each program. subparagraph.
(B) Programs Programs, strategies, and
system enhancements proposed to be funded under this
chapter shall satisfy all of the following requirements:
(i) Be based on programs and approaches that have been
demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing
juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and
delinquency, including prevention, intervention, suppression, and
incapacitation.
(ii) Collaborate and integrate services of all the resources set
forth in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), to the extent appropriate.
(iii) Employ information sharing systems to ensure that county
actions are fully coordinated, and designed to provide data for
measuring the success of juvenile justice programs and strategies.
(iv) Adopt goals related to the outcome measures that shall be
used to determine the effectiveness of the local juvenile justice
action strategy.
(C) The plan shall also identify the specific objectives of the
programs proposed for funding and specified outcome measures to
determine the effectiveness of the programs and contain an accounting
for all program participants, including those who do not complete
the programs. Outcome measures of the programs proposed to be funded
shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 100,000 population.
(ii) The rate of successful completion of probation.
(iii) The rate of successful completion of restitution and
court-ordered community service responsibilities.
(iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of
program participants.
(v) Quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program.
(D) The Board of State and Community Corrections shall review
plans or modified plans submitted pursuant to this paragraph within
30 days upon receipt of submitted or resubmitted plans or modified
plans. The board shall approve only those plans or modified plans
that fulfill the requirements of this paragraph, and shall advise a
submitting county or city and county immediately upon the approval of
its plan or modified plan. The board shall offer, and provide, if
requested, technical assistance to any county or city and county that
submits a plan or modified plan not in compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph. The SLESA shall only allocate funding
pursuant to this paragraph upon notification from the board that a
plan or modified plan has been approved.
(E) To assess the effectiveness of programs funded pursuant to
this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in
subparagraph (C), the following periodic reports shall be submitted:
(i) Each county or city and county shall report, beginning October
15, 2002, and annually each October 15 thereafter, to the county
board of supervisors and the Board of State and Community
Corrections, in a format specified by the board, on the programs
funded pursuant to this chapter and program outcomes as specified in
subparagraph (C).
(C) To assess the effectiveness of programs, strategies, and
system enhancements funded pursuant to this paragraph, each county or
city and county shall submit by October 1 of each year a report to
the county board of supervisors and to the Board of State and
Community Corrections on the programs, strategies, and system
enhancements funded pursuant to this chapter. The report shall be in
a format specified by the board that consolidates the report to be
submitted pursuant to this chapter with the annual report to be
submitted to the board for the Youthful Offender Block Grant program,
as required by subdivision (c) of Section 1961 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code. The report shall include all of the following:
(i) An updated description of the programs, strategies, and system
enhancements that have been funded pursuant to this chapter in the
immediately preceding fiscal year.
(ii) An accounting of expenditures during the immediately
preceding fiscal year for each program, strategy, or system
enhancement funded pursuant to this chapter.
(iii) A description and expenditure report for programs,
strategies, or system enhancements that have been cofunded during the
preceding fiscal year using funds provided under this chapter and
Youthful Offender Block Grant funds provided under Chapter 1.5
(commencing with Section 1950) of Division 2.5 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code.
(iv) Countywide juvenile justice trend data available from
existing statewide juvenile justice data systems or networks, as
specified by the Board of State and Community Corrections, including,
but not limited to, arrests, diversions, petitions filed, petitions
sustained, placements, incarcerations, subsequent petitions, and
probation violations, and including, in a format to be specified by
the board, a summary description or analysis, based on available
information, of how the programs, strategies, or system enhancements
funded pursuant to this chapter have or may have contributed to, or
influenced, the juvenile justice data trends identified in the
report.
(D) The board shall, within 45 days of having received the county'
s report, post on its Internet Web site a description or summary of
the programs, strategies, or system enhancements that have been
supported by funds made available to the county under this chapter.
(ii)
(E) The Board of State and Community Corrections shall
compile the local reports and, by March 15, 2003,
1 following their October 1 submission, and annually
thereafter, make a report to the Governor and the Legislature
on program expenditures within each county and city and
county from the appropriation for the purposes of this paragraph, on
the outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C) of the programs funded
pursuant to this paragraph and the statewide effectiveness of the
comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans.
summarizing the programs, strategies, and system enhancements and
related expenditures made by each county and city and county from the
appropriation made for the purposes of this paragraph. The annual
report to the Governor and the Legislature shall also summarize the
countywide trend data and any other pertinent information submitted
by counties indicating how the programs, strategies, or system
enhancements supported by funds appropriated under this chapter have
or may have contributed to, or influenced, the trends identified. The
board may consolidate the annual report to the Legislature required
under this paragraph with the annual report required by subdivision
(d) of Section 1961 of the Welfare and Institutions Code for the
Youthful Offender Block Grant program. The annual report shall be
submitted pursuant to Section 9795, and shall be posted for access by
the public on the Internet Web site of the board.
(c) Subject to subdivision (d), for each fiscal year in which the
county, each city, the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear
Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community
Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and
the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District
receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the
county, each city, and each district specified in this subdivision
shall appropriate those moneys in accordance with the following
procedures:
(1) In the case of the county, the county board of supervisors
shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to
provide frontline law enforcement services, other than those services
specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), in the
unincorporated areas of the county, in response to written requests
submitted to the board by the county sheriff and the district
attorney. Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall
specify the frontline law enforcement needs of the requesting entity,
and those personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to
meet those needs.
(2) In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate
existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline
municipal police services, in accordance with written requests
submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief
administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police
services for that city.
(3) In the case of the Broadmoor Police Protection District within
the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District
or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern
County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou
County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services
District within Contra Costa County, the legislative body of that
special district shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys
exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in
accordance with written requests submitted by the chief administrator
of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that
special district.
(d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the
Broadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo,
the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs
Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina
Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington
Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra
Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no
event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies
subsequently alter any previous, valid appropriation by that body,
for that same fiscal year, of moneys allocated to the county or city
pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b).
(e) For the 2011-12 fiscal year, the Controller shall allocate
23.54 percent of the amount deposited in the Local Law Enforcement
Services Account in the Local Revenue Fund 2011 for the purposes of
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subdivision (b), and shall allocate
23.54 percent for purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b).
(f) Commencing with the 2012-13 fiscal year, subsequent to the
allocation described in subdivision (c) of Section 29552, the
Controller shall allocate 23.54363596 percent of the remaining amount
deposited in the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount in
the Local Revenue Fund 2011 for the purposes of paragraphs (1) to
(3), inclusive, of subdivision (b), and, subsequent to the allocation
described in subdivision (c) of Section 29552, shall allocate
23.54363596 percent of the remaining amount for purposes of paragraph
(4) of subdivision (b).
(g) Commencing with the 2013-14 fiscal year, subsequent to the
allocation described in subdivision (d) of Section 29552, the
Controller shall allocate 23.54363596 percent of the remaining amount
deposited in the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount in
the Local Revenue Fund 2011 for the purposes of paragraphs (1) to
(3), inclusive, of subdivision (b), and, subsequent to the allocation
described in subdivision (d) of Section 29552, shall allocate
23.54363596 percent of the remaining amount for purposes of paragraph
(4) of subdivision (b). The Controller shall allocate funds in
monthly installments to local jurisdictions for public safety in
accordance with this section as annually calculated by the Director
of Finance.
(h) Funds received pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be expended
or encumbered in accordance with this chapter no later than June 30
of the following fiscal year. A local agency that has not met the
requirement of this subdivision shall remit unspent SLESA moneys
received after April 1, 2009, to the Controller for deposit in the
Local Safety and Protection Account, after April 1, 2012, to the
Local Law Enforcement Services Account, and after July 1, 2012, to
the County Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount. This
subdivision shall become inoperative on July 1, 2015.
(i) In the 2010-11 fiscal year, if the fourth quarter revenue
derived from fees imposed by subdivision (a) of Section 10752.2 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code that are deposited in the General Fund
and transferred to the Local Safety and Protection Account, and
continuously appropriated to the Controller for allocation pursuant
to this section, are insufficient to provide a minimum grant of one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement
jurisdiction, the county auditor shall allocate the revenue
proportionately, based on the allocation schedule in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (b). The county auditor shall proportionately allocate,
based on the allocation schedule in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b),
all revenues received after the distribution of the fourth quarter
allocation attributable to these fees for which payment was due prior
to July 1, 2011, until all minimum allocations are fulfilled, at
which point all remaining revenue shall be distributed
proportionately among the other jurisdictions.
(j) The county auditor shall redirect unspent funds that were
remitted after July 1, 2012, by a local agency to the County
Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount pursuant to
subdivision (h), to the local agency that remitted the unspent funds
in an amount equal to the amount remitted.
SECTION 1. SEC. 2. Section 6033 is
added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 6032, to read:
6033. The Board of State and Community Corrections shall
prepare guidelines shall, by January 1, 2018, develop
recommendations for best practices and standardizations for
counties on how to disaggregate juvenile justice caseload and
performance and outcome data by race and ethnicity.
SEC. 3. Section 1961 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code is amended to read:
1961. (a) On or before May 1 of each year, each county shall
prepare and submit to the Corrections Standards Authority
Board of State and Community Corrections for
approval a Juvenile Justice Development Plan on its proposed
expenditures programs, strategies, and system
enhancements for the next fiscal year from the Youthful
Offender Block Grant Fund described in Section 1951. The plan shall
include all of the following:
(1) A description of the programs, placements, services,
or strategies strategies, and system enhancements
to be funded by the block grant allocation pursuant to this
chapter, including, but not limited to, the programs, tools, and
strategies outlined in Section 1960.
(2) The proposed expenditures of block grant funds for each
program, placement, service, strategy, or for any other item,
activity, or operation.
(3)
(2) A description of how the plan relates to or
supports the county's overall strategy for dealing with youthful
offenders who have not committed an offense described in subdivision
(b) of Section 707, and who are no longer eligible for commitment to
the Division of Juvenile Facilities under Section 733 as of September
1, 2007.
(4)
(3) A description of any regional agreements or
arrangements to be supported by the block grant allocation pursuant
to this chapter.
(5)
(4) A description of how the programs, placements,
services, or strategies identified in the plan coordinate with
multiagency juvenile justice plans and programs under
Chapter 353 of the Statutes of 2000 (AB 1913).
paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government
Code.
(b) The plan described in subdivision (a) shall be submitted
in a format developed and provided by the Corrections
Standards Authority. The Corrections Standards Authority may develop
and provide a dual format for counties for the submission together of
the county Juvenile Justice Development Plan described in
subdivision (a) and the county multiagency juvenile justice plan
described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the
Government Code. A county may elect to submit both plans using the
dual format and under guidelines established by the Corrections
Standards Authority. to the Board of State and
Community Corrections in a format, as specified by the board, that
consolidates the form for submission of the plan with the form for
submission of the multiagency juvenile justice plan to be developed
and submitted to the board as provided by paragraph (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code.
(c) Each county receiving an allocation from the Youthful Offender
Block Grant fund Fund described in
Section 1951 shall, by October 1 of each year, submit an annual
report to the Corrections Standards Authority
Board of State and Community Corrections on its utilization of
the block grant funds in the preceding fiscal year. The report shall
be in a format specified by the authority and shall include
all of the following: board that consolidates the
report required by this subdivision with the annual report required
to be submitted to the b oard under the provisions of
subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061
of the Government Code, and shall include all of the following:
(1) A description of the programs, placements, services,
and strategies strategies, and system enhancements
supported by block grant funds in the preceding fiscal year,
and an accounting of all of the county's expenditures of block grant
funds for the preceding fiscal year.
(2) Performance outcomes for the programs, placements, services,
and strategies supported by block grant funds in the preceding fiscal
year, including, at a minimum, the following:
(A) The number of youth served including their characteristics as
to offense, age, gender, race, and ethnicity.
(B) As relevant to the program, placement, service, or strategy,
the rate of successful completion by youth.
(C) For any program or placement supported by block grant funds,
the arrest, rearrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of
youth in any program or placement.
(D) Quantification of the annual per capita cost of the program,
placement, strategy, or activity.
(2) A description and expenditure report for programs, strategies,
and system enhancements that have been cofunded during the preceding
fiscal year using funds provided under this chapter and juvenile
justice funds provided under paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of
Section 30061 of the Government Code.
(3) Countywide juvenile justice trend data available from existing
statewide juvenile justice data systems or networks, as specified by
the board, including, but not limited to, arrests, diversions,
petitions filed, petitions sustained, placements, incarcerations,
subsequent petitions and probation violations, and including, in a
format to be specified by the board, a summary description or
analysis, based on available information, of how the
programs, strategies, and system
enhancements funded pursuant to this chapter have or may have
contributed to, or influenced, the juvenile justice data trends
identified in the report.
(d) The authority board shall
prepare and make available to the public on its Internet Web site
summaries of the annual county reports submitted in accordance with
subdivision (c). By March 15 1 of each
year, the authority board also shall
prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature a
report summarizing county utilizations of block grant funds in the
preceding fiscal year, including a summary of the
performance outcomes reported by counties for the preceding fiscal
year. programs, strategies, system enhancements, and
related expenditures made by each county utilizing Youthful Offender
Block Grant funds. The annual report to the Governor and the
Legislature shall also summarize the countywide trend data and any
other pertinent information submitted by counties indicating how the
programs, strategies, and system enhancements supported by Youthful
Offender Block Grant funds have or may have contributed to, or
influenced, the trends identified. The board may consolidate the
annual report to the Governor and the Legislature required under this
section with the annual report required by subparagraph
(E) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of the Government Code. The
annual report shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of
the Government Code. The annual report shall also be posted for
access by the public on the Internet Web site of the board.
(e) The authority may modify the performance outcome measures
specified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) if it determines that
counties are substantially unable to provide the information
necessary to support the measures specified. Prior to making that
modification, the authority shall consult with affected county and
state juvenile justice stakeholders. In the event that any adjustment
of the performance outcome measures is made, the outcome measures
shall, to the extent feasible, remain consistent with the performance
outcome measures specified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code for programs
receiving juvenile justice grants from the Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund.
SEC. 4. Se ction 1962 of the
Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:
1962. (a) The Corrections Standards Authority, in
consultation with the Division of Juvenile Facilities,
Board of State and Community Corrections may provide technical
assistance to counties, including, but not limited to,
regional workshops, prior to issuing any Request for Proposal.
counties for the purpose of encouraging and
promoting compliance with plan and report requirements
described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061.
(b) The Corrections Standards Authority
Board of State and Community Corrections may monitor and
inspect any programs or facilities supported by block grant funds
allocated pursuant to this chapter and may enforce violations of
grant requirements with suspensions or cancellations of grant funds.
SEC. 5. If the Commission on State Mandates
determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs
shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of
Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.